Supplied is WhatsApp group
The following is an Honest opinion by AI on James Marape, the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea, reflecting a range of common perspectives held by observers, analysts, and citizens.
---
Forming an honest opinion of James Marape requires separating the powerful rhetoric of his "Take Back PNG" and "Making PNG the Richest Black Christian Nation" vision from the complex and often brutal reality of governing a nation with profound challenges. The general consensus is that of a leader with grand ambitions, but whose tenure has been marked by a frustrating gap between promise and tangible results.
*The Promising Start: The Man of the Moment (2019-2020)*
When Marape took office in 2019 after the dramatic exit of Peter O'Neill, he was seen as a breath of fresh air. His ascent was built on a platform of:
A) *Economic Nationalism:* He promised to renegotiate major resource projects, like the PNG LNG project, to ensure a much greater share of benefits remained in PNG. This "Take Back PNG" slogan resonated deeply with a populace tired of seeing multinational corporations profit enormously while local communities saw little improvement.
B) *Anti-Corruption Stance:* He positioned himself as a reformer, vowing to tackle the systemic corruption that has plagued PNG's politics and bureaucracy for decades.
C) *Empowering Local Business:* He championed the cause of Papua New Guinean-owned businesses, promising to break the oligopolies often controlled by foreign interests.
At this stage, the opinion of him was overwhelmingly positive. He was the articulate, scripture-quoting leader who seemed to understand the people's grievances and had a clear plan to address them.
*The Reality of Governance: The Growing Disconnect (2021-Present)*
As his term progressed, the immense difficulty of delivering on these promises became apparent, and public opinion began to fracture.
1. *The Economy*: Lofty Goals, Harsh Realities
Marape's economic management is a central point of criticism.
a) *Soaring Debt*: PNG's national debt has ballooned significantly under his watch. While his government argues this was necessary for investment and to navigate crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and the collapse in commodity prices, critics see it as mortgaging the country's future.
b) *Foreign Exchange Crisis*: The critical shortage of foreign currency (USD, AUD) has persisted and, many argue, worsened. This strangles businesses, deters investment, and makes importing essential goods, including medicine, incredibly difficult.
c) *Currency Devaluation*: The government's decision to devalue the Kina was a controversial move. It was presented as a necessary economic adjustment, but it has drastically increased the cost of living for ordinary Papua New Guineans, effectively making them poorer.
2. *Resource Nationalism:* More Talk Than Action?
The grand renegotiations of resource projects have yielded limited public success.While the Porgera Gold Mine was eventually reopened after a protracted stalemate, the final terms are still debated—was it a major win for PNG or a compromised deal? Other major projects, like the P'nyang gas field, have seen negotiations stall. The perception is that the aggressive "take back" rhetoric has sometimes scared off investors without securing the transformational deals that were promised.
3. *Law and Order: A Nation on Edge*
This is perhaps the most damning area of public perception.The horrific riots in Port Moresby and Lae in January 2024 were a watershed moment. They exposed a complete breakdown in security intelligence and a government seemingly caught off guard. For many citizens, the daily reality of "raskolism" (gang violence), tribal fighting in the Highlands, and pervasive corruption is worse than ever. Marape's government is widely seen as having failed to make any meaningful progress on this, the most basic function of any state.
4. *Corruption and Coalition Politics*
The anti-corruption zeal has been diluted by the necessities of maintaining a coalition government in a fractured parliament.To stay in power, Marape has had to make alliances with figures who are often the subject of corruption allegations. This has led to accusations that he is just another "politician," playing the same old games to retain power, thereby undermining his original reformist image.
*Conclusion: An Honest Assessment*
An honest opinion of James Marape is that he is a leader trapped between his vision and his nation's inertia.
i) His strengths lie in his oratory skills, his articulation of a nationalistic vision that resonates with many, and his political shrewdness in maintaining a fragile coalition.
ii) His weaknesses are seen in the execution. The economy is in a precarious state, law and order have deteriorated, and the tangible improvements in healthcare, education, and infrastructure that citizens were promised have been few and far between.
Ultimately, many who were once hopeful now view his premiership with deep disappointment. They see a leader who talks of making PNG the "richest black Christian nation" while the country grapples with a failing currency, rampant violence, and a struggling population. He is not seen as malevolent, but as perhaps overwhelmed by the sheer scale of PNG's problems and constrained by a political system that rewards short-term survival over long-term reform.
The final judgment is still being written, but the current popular opinion is that James Marape's legacy is at risk of being defined not by the nation he promised to build, but by the one he has, thus far, been unable to fundamentally change.
-----
*By AI*
