Search This Blog

Total Pageviews

Advertisement

Labels

Blog Archive

Editorial|PNG SUN| - Papua New Guinea Government's Position and The Respond from the Autonomous Bougainville Government President Ishmael Toroama


#pngsun #editorial: Autonomous Bougainville Government President Ishmael Toroama has made it clear in the recent past that Bougainville will move forward with its independence plans even if the PNG Parliament rejects the 2019 referendum result.

He was bluntly speaking in a video recorded during the passage of its annual budget.
His strong stand reflects growing frustration among Bougainvilleans. This must not be taken lightly by the National Government and its relevant ministry with the Parliamentary bodies. It is not a threat but possibilities.
The statement itself reflects elements of possibilities in light of regional diplomatic ‘cold wars’ before us.
To PNG, the island has an autonomous government but still part of its territorial integrity. To the world, the ABG is invited directly by overseas governments to attend events, forums and meetings.
We do not want anymore wars-we have had enough. Wars are definitely not the panacea to their aspirations. Everyone wants a peaceful journey determining the political future of the island.
We have a vehicle Joint Supervisory Body through the Melanesian partnership agreement between the two parties. It drives views of each party in mutual and peaceful means.
What is needed urgently is an open and honest discussion based on reality, not emotion, pride, or political pressure.
Independence does not have to be an all-or-nothing choice. Around the world, there are workable models where regions control their own affairs while keeping some links with the main country.
Examples include Guam and Puerto Rico under the United States, Greenland under Denmark, Hong Kong under China, and the United Kingdom’s devolved system. These models show that strong self-rule can exist without a total breakdown.
A smart option for Bougainville would be to push for full control of resources, revenue laws, and local governance, while PNG carries old national responsibilities. Bougainville could also use easy access to PNG markets to grow jobs and income.
For PNG, such arrangements could protect stability, reduce financial risks, and keep economic ties alive.
The real problem is not lack of choices, but lack of fresh thinking. Honest dialogue and practical solutions are now more important than ever.

Is It Truly The MARAPE s CURSE? 18 MPs & Counting! 18th MAN DOWN! STILL COUNTING


PANGU LED REGIME LOST 18 MEMBERS IN DEATH ALONE FROM 2019 TO 2025 WHILE SERVING STABILITY OF THE MARAPE LED GOVERNMENT.

Following Governor Luther Wenge's recent death on September 13th 2025 to no Hon Mirisim, the total number of Papua New Guinea MPs who died between 2019 and 2025 has reached 18; they all have died while actively serving the stability of the PANGU-led regime.
The updated list of deceased MPs is as follows:
10th Parliament (2017–2022)
Thomas Pelika: Member for Menyamya (died October 30, 2019)
Sir Mekere Morauta: Member for Moresby North-West (died December 19, 2020)
Richard Mendani: Member for Kerema (died March 20, 2021)
Roy Biyama: Member for Middle Fly (died September 11, 2021)
Jonny Alonk: Member for Middle Ramu (died November 29, 2021)
Sam Akoitai: Member for Central Bougainville (died December 17, 2021)
William Samb: Member for Goilala (died March 3, 2022)
Sam Basil: Deputy Prime Minister and Member for Bulolo (died May 11, 2022)
Chris Nangoi: Member for Sumkar (died June 9, 2022)
William Nakin: Member for North Bougainville (died July 12, 2022)
11th Parliament (2022–Present)
11. Kevin Isifu: Member for Wewak (died September 14, 2022)
12. Gabriel Kapris: Member for Maprik (died August 13, 2023)
13. Steven Pim: Member for Dei (died September 24, 2023)
14. Maso Karipe: Member for Porgera-Paiela (died November 7, 2023)
15. Jimmy Uguro: Member for Usino-Bundi (died February 6, 2024)
16. Simon Dumarinu: Member for Central Bougainville (died August 9, 2024)
17. Luther Wenge: Governor for Morobe Province (died September 13, 2025).
18. Solan Mirisim (died 2-12-2025)
(We have 13 x PANGU MPs currently with Serious Medical Conditions_The Nation Prays that we have 30+ DEATHS before 2027 NGE)
#PNG50Years#fypã‚·゚viralã‚·fypã‚·゚viralã‚·alã‚·#PanguPati#PNGIndependence#PNGinPiksa#PNPPRO1Official

Tomorrow Never Comes and Yesterday Never Existed: Both are Always HERE and Now

 


by Elder Wewo Kotokay, Melanesian Conservatoin Elders, Inc.

1. Deconstructing the Phrases

  • "Tomorrow never comes" / "Next year never arrives": This is a statement about the ever-receding future. The moment we label as "tomorrow" or "next year" ceases to be that label as soon as we enter it. At midnight, "tomorrow" becomes "today." On January 1st, "next year" becomes "this year." The future is perpetually a horizon we approach but never stand upon as the future. It's a destination that transforms into the present upon arrival.
  • "Yesterday never existed" / "Last year never was": This is the symmetrical problem of the elusive past. The "yesterday" we refer to is not a tangible thing that exists somewhere. It is a mental construct—a memory, a record, a trace. The actual lived moment we call "yesterday" has vanished into non-being. It was, but it is not. We only ever have present recollections of it.
  • "Yesterday never gone": This is the most subtle and interesting counterpoint. It suggests that the past is not truly lost but continues to exist in its effects—in memories, trauma, history, consequences, and the physical world (a scar, a ruined building, a fossil). In this view, the past is ontologically present in its causal power. It "never gone" because it actively shapes the now.

2. The Philosophical Core: The Paradox of the Present (The "Specious Present")

The tension between these phrases points to the central puzzle: What is the "now"?

  • The Mathematical Now: If "now" is an infinitesimal point between past and future (like a geometric point), then it has no duration. We cannot live in, experience, or even point to such a "now." It is an abstraction.
  • The Experiential Now (William James' "Specious Present"): Our lived present always has a duration—a few seconds. Within this brief span, we hold the just-past (the echo of a sentence) and the anticipation of the immediate future (the next word). So our "now" is always already containing a slice of what we call "past" and "future."
    • This explains "yesterday never gone" psychologically—the immediate past is still present in our consciousness.
    • It also shows why "tomorrow never comes"—because the anticipated future is already partially present as anticipation.

3. Philosophical Frameworks for Understanding

  • St. Augustine's Paradox (Confessions, Book XI): He famously asked, "What then is time? If no one asks me, I know; if I wish to explain it to one who asks, I know not." He concluded that past and future only exist in the mind:
    • The past exists as memoria (memory).
    • The future exists as expectatio (expectation).
    • The present exists as contuitus (attention).
      Thus, "tomorrow" exists only as a present expectation, and "yesterday" only as a present memory. They are modes of present consciousness.
  • McTaggart's A-Series and B-Series:
    • A-Series: Time as past, present, future (subjective, flowing). This is where our phrases live. The problem is that the labels "past," "present," and "future" are constantly changing (an event is future, then present, then past). This seems contradictory—how can one event have all three properties? This is the "unreality" of time for McTaggart.
    • B-Series: Time as earlier-than and later-than (objective, static). In this view, 2023 is always earlier than 2024. "Next year" (2025) has a fixed, permanent relation to "this year" (2024). It always arrives in the B-Series, because its position is fixed. The "never comes" feeling is a feature of our A-Series perception.
  • Phenomenology (Husserl, Heidegger): They focus on time as the structure of human experience (Dasein). For Heidegger, we are inherently temporal. We are "thrown" from a past, "projecting" into a future, and "falling" through the present. "Tomorrow never comes" because our "projection" always leaps ahead. "Yesterday never gone" because we are our past ("thrownness").
  • Zen Buddhism & Mindfulness: These traditions take the paradox as a practical instruction. Dwelling on "yesterday" (regret, nostalgia) or "tomorrow" (anxiety, hope) is a source of suffering because these are mental illusions. The only reality is the eternal present moment. The goal is to fully inhabit the "now" that never moves, thus resolving the paradox through direct experience.

Synthesis and Conclusion

These phrases are not literally true in a physical sense (2025 will indeed follow 2024), but they are profoundly true at the level of conscious experience and linguistic reference.

  1. They reveal the fluidity of temporal language. Words like "tomorrow" are indexicals—their meaning depends on the ever-changing "now" of the speaker.
  2. They highlight the ontological mystery of time. The past and future do not "exist" in the way physical objects do. They exist as relational properties and mental phenomena.
  3. They point to the primacy of the present as the locus of reality and experience. All we ever have is a moving, duration-filled present that carries the ghost of the past and the blueprint of the future within it.

In essence: "Tomorrow never comes" because the future is a mode of present anticipation. "Yesterday never existed" (as a present object) but also "never gone" because it exists as a present memory and causal force. The paradox is the very fabric of human temporality—we are beings stretched between a memory and a promise, forever anchored in a fleeting, yet expansive, now.

 

Finance Minister calls on ITL to expand investment horizons

 Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Johnny Koanapo has urged Ifira Trustees Limited (ITL) to move beyond its traditional business activities and venture into new investment horizons, as the government seeks to deepen public-private partnerships to strengthen the national economy.

He made the remarks in mid-December while receiving a government dividend from Ifira Ports Development Services Ltd (IPDSL), speaking in the presence of ITL Chairman Pa’au Nimanu Teriki Mantoi Kalsakau III, Prime Minister Jotham Napat, ITL executive directors, board members, and shareholders.

I


PDSL operates as a key stevedoring and port services company at Lapetasi Wharf in Port Vila, providing cargo handling, container operations, and vessel loading and unloading services critical to Vanuatu’s trade and supply chain.

The company is structured as a public-private partnership, with the Vanuatu Government holding a 49 per cent stake and ITL owning the remaining 51 per cent. This arrangement allows both the state and customary landowners to benefit directly while ensuring professional and efficient management.

Minister Koanapo said IPDSL’s consistent profitability and regular dividend payments demonstrate the strength of this shared-ownership model, which serves as a benchmark for effective collaboration between government and landowners.

He encouraged ITL to build on this success by pursuing diversified investments across new economic sectors, including infrastructure, aviation, commercial hubs, and value-adding industries.

The Minister reaffirmed the government’s commitment to supporting such ventures through policy and investment facilitation, noting that Vanuatu’s economic recovery and future growth depend on moving beyond business as usual to create jobs, strengthen resilience, and expand the national economy.

Analysis | Why Starlink Is Blocked While PNG Citizens Pay the Price


I’ll explain the Starlink and NICTA situation if you don’t understand, because names keep getting thrown around and people are expected to magically know who is who. So let’s slow it down with the facts .

Starlink a company owned by Space X wants to operate in Papua New Guinea as one of the telecommunication companies, just like Digicel, Telikom, or Vodafone. They want to register locally, follow the law, sell internet to businesses and citizens, and work with the existing system. The difference is, Starlink does not need DataCo’s cables or towers. It uses satellites, which means it can provide fast, reliable, cheap internet anywhere in the country even in remote provinces where current telecoms fail.
PNG DataCo is our government-owned company. It does not sell internet to the public. Its job is to own and manage the big national infrastructure like the undersea cables, the long fiber cables across the country, the backbone network. Telecom companies must use DataCo’s network to connect to the outside world. This is where DataCo makes its money.
Telecommunication companies like Digicel, Telikom, Vodafone, and Enterprise Telecom are the ones selling internet and mobile services to you and me . They own the towers and SIM cards, but they depend on DataCo’s cables. They charge the public very high prices, give poor service, and blame “technical issues” like it’s normal. They make money. DataCo makes money. The public suffers.
Initially NICTA wanted to bring Starlink into PNG and issue the licence so citizens and businesses could get fast, affordable internet. But the Ombudsman Commission (OC) stepped in and blocked NICTA from granting the licence, claiming the process wasn’t fully legal or safe for national interests, public data, and citizens. Because of the OC’s directive, NICTA cannot proceed until the National Court decides whether the OC’s block is valid. That’s why there is a court case between NICTA and the OC, and why Starlink cannot operate even though it’s ready to provide services.
Now here is where everything breaks.
The government borrowed over K1 billion to build DataCo’s cable network. That money must be paid back. DataCo needs big customers using its cables or the whole thing collapses financially. That means mines, banks, businesses, and government offices and the general public weather you digice or Vodafone it dosent matter whats matter is they must stay on DataCo-connected networks.
Starlink bypasses all of that. It does not use DataCo. It does not pay DataCo. It does not need towers or cables. When a mine or business switches to Starlink, DataCo loses revenue instantly. That threatens the government’s ability to pay back its loans.
So Starlink becomes a problem. Not because it is bad. Not because it is unsafe. But because it exposes how expensive and inefficient the current system is.
The government panics. If Starlink is allowed freely, DataCo and Telikom could collapse before the debt is paid. That would leave the government with massive loans and no income. So instead of fixing prices and improving service, they choose protection.
Ombudsman Commission steps in and blocks Starlink using licensing and legal language. On December 11, 2025, NICTA ordered Starlink to stop operating in PNG. After that, Starlink shut down services. NICTA then warned that people using Starlink dishes are “illegal operators” under an old 2009 law written before satellite internet like this even existed.
So now citizens trying to get affordable, reliable internet are treated like criminals, while expensive telecom companies continue giving poor service without consequences.
This is the cold hard truth. The government is not protecting citizens. It is protecting debt, revenue, and control. Telecom companies are protected. DataCo is protected. The people are not.
That is why Starlink is blocked.Starlink has officially suspended its operations in Papua New Guinea as of late December 2025

Unprecedented Armed Heist

 Vanuatu experienced its first-ever armed robbery yesterday after masked men travelling in a white minibus seized a suitcase of foreign currency worth around VT8 million at the Port Vila International Airport Cargo Terminal. The cash was taken from a vehicle reported to be owned by Goodies.

Commissioner of Police (COMPOL) Kalshem Bongran said the daylight robbery occurred at approximately 11.59am.


The incident has raised serious concerns about airport security and is being treated as unprecedented in the country’s history.

Eyewitnesses at the airport told the Daily Post that the suspects used firearms wrapped in cloth to threaten the driver and Western Union staff before fleeing in a white minibus with dark-tinted windows.

One eyewitness suggested the robbery may have involved inside knowledge.

“I heard some women shouting that they stole the money. The truck was parked inside, and the minibus was blocking its way out. It looked like they were acting on instructions from someone.

“Why didn’t the Western Union officers try to follow them? Their truck is stronger than the minibus; they could have chased it. This really looks like an inside job,” the eyewitness told the Daily Post.

Another eyewitness, who saw the minibus heading towards Bladiniere after the robbery, said: “I was heading back to my house near Kings Motor. The road has many potholes, so I slowed down when the minibus passed me. A few minutes later, I saw photos of the van posted online. The way it sped past showed they were in a hurry or had done something wrong.”

Minister condemns robbery

The Minister of Internal Affairs, Andrew Napuat, who has oversight of the Vanuatu Police Force (VPF), condemned the incident.

“As Minister responsible for the VPF, I condemn these actions as they do not reflect our Vanuatu way of life, Melanesian values, or Christian principles. This incident has taken the country by surprise,” he said.

He said that although police officers are deployed daily at the airport, the robbery was carried out so quickly that officers were unable to stop the suspects from escaping.

“Operational orders have been signed and approved to ensure those responsible are captured. I ask the public not to speculate on social media, but to provide accurate information to the VPF if they have any leads,” the Minister said.

The Minister also called for national cooperation, urging community leaders and citizens to support police efforts. He advised the public to remain alert, particularly if they see suspicious minibuses, and to avoid approaching potential suspects while police operations are ongoing.

Authorities continue to investigate the incident, which has sent shockwaves across the country as the first armed robbery of its kind in Vanuatu.

COMPOL appeals for public support and surrender

COMPOL Bongran addressed the public yesterday evening, providing further details on the robbery at the international airport.

He explained that a Goodies vehicle had travelled to the airport carrying foreign currency for weighing and verification by Customs officers before being sent overseas. During the process, the vehicle stopped when a white minibus bearing registration number “557” suddenly arrived.

Two occupants exited the minibus. One approached the driver and punched him, while the other produced a firearm and pointed it at the female officer accompanying the driver, causing both officers to panic.

One of the suspects then entered the vehicle and took a suitcase containing foreign currency valued at around VT8 million.

There were three suitcases in total, but the suspects managed to take only one before fleeing the scene in the white minibus.

Because the suspects were armed, as recorded in the incident report submitted by airport police, the COMPOL’s office moved quickly to deploy Vanuatu Mobile Force (VMF) officers. This followed the standard firearms authorisation process approved by the responsible minister. VMF officers were deployed alongside police officers to locate the suspect vehicle, apprehend those involved, and recover the stolen money.

The COMPOL appealed for public assistance, saying, “We need public support at this time.”

“If any member of the public sees the white minibus anywhere in Port Vila, including car parks or private properties, or notices a minibus with tinted windows matching the description and the number plate ‘557’, or even if the number plate has been removed, please contact the VPF immediately so officers can take action,” he said.

“We want to apprehend the suspects so they can face justice.

“My other call as COMPOL is to assure the public that the VPF is closely monitoring the situation and police will do everything possible, together with the public, to apprehend the suspects.

“I ask the public not to panic and to remain calm. Your support is very important. You may see VMF officers deployed and armed. This reflects our response, as the robbery suspects are armed.

“With the current situation, the public is advised to take extra precautions in public places such as shopping centres and other areas, and even at home. Safety measures are important, as it is unclear whether the suspects may attempt further offences. Their intentions are unknown.

“I appeal to the people of north and south Efate: if you see any vehicle matching the description of this minibus in your area, report it immediately to police.”

“I also appeal to the two robbers and anyone else involved in this armed robbery to surrender to the VPF with the stolen money,” COMPOL Bongran said.

“If you are afraid to go directly to a police station, surrender to your responsible chiefs, who can bring you to police. This matter will be handled lawfully so everyone can move forward and enjoy the upcoming New Year celebrations.

“I appeal again, surrender yourselves to the VPF.”

Should there be further developments in this case, the COMPOL’s office remains ready to update the public in the coming hours and days.

Meanwhile, in confirming the robbery at the Port Vila International Airport Cargo Terminal, Airports Vanuatu assured that both international and domestic flights are unaffected and that normal airport operations are continuing.

Anyone who sees the white minibus or notices suspicious activity within their community or around Port Vila is urged to contact police immediately on 7744495 or 7347520.